Semua artikel di dalam blog.ini di ambil dari blog.lain yg.mengambil kira kebaikan,dan keberkesanan Ilmu,Pandangan,maklumat yg,perlu di sebarkan.terima kasih.
وَكَذَلِكَ مَكَّنِّا لِيُوسُفَ فِي الأَرْضِ يَتَبَوَّأُ مِنْهَا حَيْثُ يَشَاءُ نُصِيبُ بِرَحْمَتِنَا مَن نَّشَاء وَلاَ نُضِيعُ أَجْرَ الْمُحْسِنِينَ
Dan demikianlah caranya, Kami tetapkan kedudukan Yusuf memegang kuasa di bumi Mesir; ia bebas tinggal di negeri itu di mana sahaja yang disukainya. Kami limpahkan rahmat Kami kepada sesiapa sahaja yang Kami kehendaki, dan Kami tidak menghilangkan balasan baik orang-orang yang berbuat kebaikan.
Surah Yusuf, Ayat 56
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Zambry is MB, rules court
Friday, May 22, 2009
"..Yet today, malay nowadays are the malay we are.., Sorry to interrupt, but I like to come to my own conclusion: people fear to dissolve the assembly legislative simply because - they are afraid of losing power, losing power make them becoming losing a lot of easy contract, losing contract means they are losing easy money. And losing money will be the most fear situation on these people life..."
"Kebenaran telah tiba", itulah kata Zambry. Mahkamah Rayuan hari ini telah memutuskan bahawa Zambry adalah MB Perak yang sah. Saya tidak mahu komen keputusan mahkamah kerana ada dua sebab. Pertama, saya bukan pakar undang-undang sedangkan yang pakar undang-undang pun ramai yang berpendapat Nizar adalah MB Perak yang sah.
Keduanya, saya tidaklah jahil sangat untuk memahami mahkamah yang ada di negara kita ini. Cukuplah jika saya sekadar ucap `tahniah' kepada Zambry kerana beliau masih sanggup berdepan dengan rakyat Perak selepas penghakiman ini meskipun beliau tahu apa yang ada di dalam lubuk hati nurani rakyat Perak.
Gembira dengan keputusan tersebut di Slim River, Zambry menyifatkannya "kebenaran telah tiba." Saya tidak dapat menyelami hati dan perasaan majoriti rakyat Perak ketika ini. Mungkin bagi Zambry, rakyat seluruh Perak kini sedang berpesta dan bersukaria kerana menyambut kemenangan Zambry selaku MB Perak yang ditentukan oleh mahkamah.
Pada saya hanya mahkamah akhirat yang mutlak. Buktinya, keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi yang menyebelahi Nizar dianggap silap oleh Mahkamah Rayuan sebentar tadi.
Selepas ini, mungkin.. mungkin...tiada lagi silap apabila kes ini dirayu oleh Nizar ke Mahkamah Persekutuan. saya yakin, Mahkamah Persekutuan tidak akan mengatakan Mahkamah Rayuan sebentar tadi silap. Maksud saya, mungkin tiada lagi kesilapan selepas ini. Ini bermakna, bawalah ke mana-mana mahkamah di Malaysia ini mungkin tiada lagi kesilapan dan Zambry terus ditabalkan sebagai MB Perak.
Rekod dunia mungkin boleh dicipta dengan berbagai peristiwa yang berlaku di Perak selepas lahirnya `spesis' katak yang lapar ini. Berbagai pandangan dan nasihat telah diberikan untuk menyelesaikan krisis politik di Perak sekarang, tetapi masih ada yang suka memilih mahkamah untuk menentukan kerusi dan kedudukan mereka.
Malangnya rakyat Perak, mereka tidak diberi peluang untuk berperanan menstabilkan keadaan politik yang cerca merba ini. Mereka hanya layak sebagai penonton kepada `drama' yang tidak berkesudahan ini.
Oleh : WFAUZDIN NS@albanjari online
Petikan dari sumber
UPDATED
By Neville Spykerman
However under article 16 (6) the Ruler has the discretion to refuse to dissolve the assembly and Nizar must resign along with his state executive council members.
The court ruled there was no legal requirement for a vote of no confidence to be takes against Nizar and the Ssultan could looks at other means to determine if he has lost the support of his fellow lawmakers.
In this case the Sultan was right to speak to the three independent and 28 BN lawmakers and it is was clear Nizar had lost the support of the majority in the House.
He added that the High Court judge had wrongly interpreted the Perak constitution.
Friday May 22 2009
Related Articles
* Sultan did the right thing, says AG
* No laws exist to remove MBs, says Nizar's lawyers
* DAP protests ‘doctored’ BN DVDs
* Pembubaran DUN Perak kian hampir — Husam Musa
* Judgment day tomorrow in MB vs MB case
* BN hurt by bad public relations
* Absolute or constitutional monarchy? — Lord Bobo
* Why no Federal Court written judgment on Perak – N.H. Chan
Nizar pledges fresh polls
By Edward Cheah and Lee Wei Lian
PUTRAJAYA, MAY 21 — Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin says he will continue to push for fresh elections in Perak as the best way to solve the constitutional impasse regardless of tomorrow’s Court of Appeal decision over who should rightly be the mentri besar.
“I’m not going to rely on the court’s decision. It is only a legal process, the solution is to give the people the right to choose a new government,” Nizar told reporters outside the courtroom here today.
Zambry is MB, rules court
UPDATED
By Neville Spykerman
PUTRAJAYA, May 22 - The Court of Appeal today returned a unanimous decision that Barisan Nasional's Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir is the rightful Perak mentri besar, ruling that his Pakatan Rakyat rival Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddinn had ceased to command the majority in the Perak state assembly.
The judges also ruled that the Sultan was right in appointing Zambry the MB and that there was no need for a vote of no confidence in the House against Nizar.
The three-member Bench comprising Justices Md Raus Shariff, Zainun Ali and Ahmad Maarop delivered judgment after hearing submissions from both parties yesterday.
"It is clear the respondent (the state opposition leader) had ceased to command confidence of the Perak state assembly. The Sultan was right to appoint Zambry," Md Raus said.
However, the Court of Appeal decision is not expected to bring an end to the crisis in Perak as the parties can still appeal to the Federal Court.
This afternoon, security at the Court of Appeal was tight with police taking extra precautions in allowing people into the courtroom.
Nizar's counsel Sulaiman Abdullah said he would be filing an appeal.
Md Raus said he had attempted to write the judgement last night but failed.
He assured Suleiman they would have one within a week.
Later when asked if he was shocked at the court’s decision Sulaiman said “We have extraordinary judges in Malaysia with extraordinary abilities”.
He added there was no automatic right of appeal to the Federal Court. Permission to appeal must be obtained from the Court of Appeal.
“We are disappointed but not surprised at the decision.” said former PR Perak executive council member Nga Kor Ming.
He said although they may have lost the legal battle but they had won the hearts of people. “The people will judge the judgement.”
He added the courts were not the best way to solve the crisis and itis better to let the people decide.
Meanwhile BN lawyer Firoz Hussein said there was no need for fresh elections in Perak. “To us it’s already academic because the court has affirm the Perak ruler was right when he withheld consent to dissolve.”
Hundreds of PR supporters gathered briefly outside the court complex after the ruling was pronounced, and shouted slogans to back Nizar, including chanting “Refomasi” and “Bubar DUN”.
Neither Nizar nor Zambry were present in court today.
The DAP's Lim Kit Siang, who was present in court, said today's decision could spark more unhappiness with the administration of Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
Najib is seen as the man who engineered the Perak power grab in February that plunged the state into a constitutional crisis.
Lim said the best solution remains the dissolution of the state assembly to pave the way for fresh elections.
[Datuk Hafanisa being mobbed by reporters as he walks out of the court. – Picture by Jack Ooi]
Datuk Hafanisa being mobbed by reporters as he walks out of the court. – Picture by Jack Ooi
Meanwhile, Bar Council president Ragunath Kesavan said the decision seemed to suggest that rulers have more power than what is stated in the constitution.
"This would be a huge burden for the rulers in future situations because they can no longer say that the decision should go to the state assembly," he explained.
Ragunath added that the decision did not resolve the constitutional issues involved in the Perak fiasco and echoed popular sentiment that it would be best to bring the matter back to the people for a fresh mandate.
Yesterday Nizar had also said he wanted fresh elections whatever the court decision today was.
Last week the Kuala Lumpur High Court had ruled that Nizar was the rightful mentri besar because according to the state constitution the only way to remove an MB was through a vote of no confidence in the legislature.
The Sultan, the court ruled, could not dismiss a state's chief executive.
The Court of Appeal disagreed today, and accepted Zambry's argument that Nizar had already lost the support of a majority of the assembly when he went to seek the Sultan's consent for the legislature to be dissolved.
Md Raus who delivered the grounds said Nizar had sought the dissolution under article 16(6) of the Perak constitution and not article 36(2) as argued by his lawyers.
Article 36(2) is generally used to call for elections after an end of term and the question of resignations does not arise.
However under article 16 (6) the Ruler has the discretion to refuse to dissolve the assembly and Nizar must resign along with his state executive council members.
The court ruled there was no legal requirement for a vote of no confidence to be takes against Nizar and the Ssultan could looks at other means to determine if he has lost the support of his fellow lawmakers.
In this case the Sultan was right to speak to the three independent and 28 BN lawmakers and it is was clear Nizar had lost the support of the majority in the House.
He added that the High Court judge had wrongly interpreted the Perak constitution.
Nizar and other Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders attended today a Court of Appeal hearing on Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir’s appeal against last week’s high court decision ruling Nizar the rightful MB.
The constitutional crisis has dragged on since BN’s power grab in February.
There is growing support for fresh polls, even among BN leaders, for fresh polls as a way to resolve the conflict.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has suggested BN were ready for talks with PR leaders to find a solution.
DAP Perak Chief Ngeh Koo Ham echoed Nizar and told The Malaysian Insider that the best way out of the political mess was to dissolve the state assembly.
“The court isn’t the place to solve the Perak crisis and whatever the outcome the crisis in Perak will drag on and whoever loses will appeal,” stressed Ngeh.
Ngeh went on to say that Pakatan Rakyat was more concerned with how to find a solution.
The Court of Appeal will give its decision tomorrow afternoon.
Zambry is MB, rules court
UPDATED
By Neville SpykermanPUTRAJAYA, May 22 - The Court of Appeal today returned a unanimous decision that Barisan Nasional's Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir is the rightful Perak mentri besar, ruling that his Pakatan Rakyat rival Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddinn had ceased to command the majority in the Perak state assembly.
The three-member Bench comprising Justices Md Raus Shariff, Zainun Ali and Ahmad Maarop delivered judgment after hearing submissions from both parties yesterday.
"It is clear the respondent (the state opposition leader) had ceased to command confidence of the Perak state assembly. The Sultan was right to appoint Zambry," Md Raus said.
However, the Court of Appeal decision is not expected to bring an end to the crisis in Perak as the parties can still appeal to the Federal Court.
This afternoon, security at the Court of Appeal was tight with police taking extra precautions in allowing people into the courtroom.
Nizar's counsel Sulaiman Abdullah said he would be filing an appeal.
Md Raus said he had attempted to write the judgement last night but failed.
He assured Suleiman they would have one within a week.
Later when asked if he was shocked at the court’s decision Sulaiman said “We have extraordinary judges in Malaysia with extraordinary abilities”.
He added there was no automatic right of appeal to the Federal Court. Permission to appeal must be obtained from the Court of Appeal.
“We are disappointed but not surprised at the decision.” said former PR Perak executive council member Nga Kor Ming.
He said although they may have lost the legal battle but they had won the hearts of people. “The people will judge the judgement.”
He added the courts were not the best way to solve the crisis and itis better to let the people decide.
Meanwhile BN lawyer Firoz Hussein said there was no need for fresh elections in Perak. “To us it’s already academic because the court has affirm the Perak ruler was right when he withheld consent to dissolve.”
Hundreds of PR supporters gathered briefly outside the court complex after the ruling was pronounced, and shouted slogans to back Nizar, including chanting “Refomasi” and “Bubar DUN”.
Neither Nizar nor Zambry were present in court today.
The DAP's Lim Kit Siang, who was present in court, said today's decision could spark more unhappiness with the administration of Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
Najib is seen as the man who engineered the Perak power grab in February that plunged the state into a constitutional crisis.
Lim said the best solution remains the dissolution of the state assembly to pave the way for fresh elections.
Meanwhile, Bar Council president Ragunath Kesavan said the decision seemed to suggest that rulers have more power than what is stated in the constitution."This would be a huge burden for the rulers in future situations because they can no longer say that the decision should go to the state assembly," he explained.
Ragunath added that the decision did not resolve the constitutional issues involved in the Perak fiasco and echoed popular sentiment that it would be best to bring the matter back to the people for a fresh mandate.
Yesterday Nizar had also said he wanted fresh elections whatever the court decision today was.
Last week the Kuala Lumpur High Court had ruled that Nizar was the rightful mentri besar because according to the state constitution the only way to remove an MB was through a vote of no confidence in the legislature.
The Sultan, the court ruled, could not dismiss a state's chief executive.
The Court of Appeal disagreed today, and accepted Zambry's argument that Nizar had already lost the support of a majority of the assembly when he went to seek the Sultan's consent for the legislature to be dissolved.
Md Raus who delivered the grounds said Nizar had sought the dissolution under article 16(6) of the Perak constitution and not article 36(2) as argued by his lawyers.Article 36(2) is generally used to call for elections after an end of term and the question of resignations does not arise.
However under article 16 (6) the Ruler has the discretion to refuse to dissolve the assembly and Nizar must resign along with his state executive council members.
The court ruled there was no legal requirement for a vote of no confidence to be takes against Nizar and the Ssultan could looks at other means to determine if he has lost the support of his fellow lawmakers.
In this case the Sultan was right to speak to the three independent and 28 BN lawmakers and it is was clear Nizar had lost the support of the majority in the House.
He added that the High Court judge had wrongly interpreted the Perak constitution.
Friday May 22 2009
Related Articles
* Sultan did the right thing, says AG
* No laws exist to remove MBs, says Nizar's lawyers
* DAP protests ‘doctored’ BN DVDs
* Pembubaran DUN Perak kian hampir — Husam Musa
* Judgment day tomorrow in MB vs MB case
* BN hurt by bad public relations
* Absolute or constitutional monarchy? — Lord Bobo
* Why no Federal Court written judgment on Perak – N.H. Chan
Nizar pledges fresh polls
By Edward Cheah and Lee Wei Lian
PUTRAJAYA, MAY 21 — Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin says he will continue to push for fresh elections in Perak as the best way to solve the constitutional impasse regardless of tomorrow’s Court of Appeal decision over who should rightly be the mentri besar.
“I’m not going to rely on the court’s decision. It is only a legal process, the solution is to give the people the right to choose a new government,” Nizar told reporters outside the courtroom here today.
Zambry is MB, rules court
UPDATED
By Neville Spykerman
PUTRAJAYA, May 22 - The Court of Appeal today returned a unanimous decision that Barisan Nasional's Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir is the rightful Perak mentri besar, ruling that his Pakatan Rakyat rival Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddinn had ceased to command the majority in the Perak state assembly.
The judges also ruled that the Sultan was right in appointing Zambry the MB and that there was no need for a vote of no confidence in the House against Nizar.
The three-member Bench comprising Justices Md Raus Shariff, Zainun Ali and Ahmad Maarop delivered judgment after hearing submissions from both parties yesterday.
"It is clear the respondent (the state opposition leader) had ceased to command confidence of the Perak state assembly. The Sultan was right to appoint Zambry," Md Raus said.
However, the Court of Appeal decision is not expected to bring an end to the crisis in Perak as the parties can still appeal to the Federal Court.
This afternoon, security at the Court of Appeal was tight with police taking extra precautions in allowing people into the courtroom.
Nizar's counsel Sulaiman Abdullah said he would be filing an appeal.
Md Raus said he had attempted to write the judgement last night but failed.
He assured Suleiman they would have one within a week.
Later when asked if he was shocked at the court’s decision Sulaiman said “We have extraordinary judges in Malaysia with extraordinary abilities”.
He added there was no automatic right of appeal to the Federal Court. Permission to appeal must be obtained from the Court of Appeal.
“We are disappointed but not surprised at the decision.” said former PR Perak executive council member Nga Kor Ming.
He said although they may have lost the legal battle but they had won the hearts of people. “The people will judge the judgement.”
He added the courts were not the best way to solve the crisis and itis better to let the people decide.
Meanwhile BN lawyer Firoz Hussein said there was no need for fresh elections in Perak. “To us it’s already academic because the court has affirm the Perak ruler was right when he withheld consent to dissolve.”
Hundreds of PR supporters gathered briefly outside the court complex after the ruling was pronounced, and shouted slogans to back Nizar, including chanting “Refomasi” and “Bubar DUN”.
Neither Nizar nor Zambry were present in court today.
The DAP's Lim Kit Siang, who was present in court, said today's decision could spark more unhappiness with the administration of Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
Najib is seen as the man who engineered the Perak power grab in February that plunged the state into a constitutional crisis.
Lim said the best solution remains the dissolution of the state assembly to pave the way for fresh elections.
[Datuk Hafanisa being mobbed by reporters as he walks out of the court. – Picture by Jack Ooi]
Datuk Hafanisa being mobbed by reporters as he walks out of the court. – Picture by Jack Ooi
Meanwhile, Bar Council president Ragunath Kesavan said the decision seemed to suggest that rulers have more power than what is stated in the constitution.
"This would be a huge burden for the rulers in future situations because they can no longer say that the decision should go to the state assembly," he explained.
Ragunath added that the decision did not resolve the constitutional issues involved in the Perak fiasco and echoed popular sentiment that it would be best to bring the matter back to the people for a fresh mandate.
Yesterday Nizar had also said he wanted fresh elections whatever the court decision today was.
Last week the Kuala Lumpur High Court had ruled that Nizar was the rightful mentri besar because according to the state constitution the only way to remove an MB was through a vote of no confidence in the legislature.
The Sultan, the court ruled, could not dismiss a state's chief executive.
The Court of Appeal disagreed today, and accepted Zambry's argument that Nizar had already lost the support of a majority of the assembly when he went to seek the Sultan's consent for the legislature to be dissolved.
Md Raus who delivered the grounds said Nizar had sought the dissolution under article 16(6) of the Perak constitution and not article 36(2) as argued by his lawyers.
Article 36(2) is generally used to call for elections after an end of term and the question of resignations does not arise.
However under article 16 (6) the Ruler has the discretion to refuse to dissolve the assembly and Nizar must resign along with his state executive council members.
The court ruled there was no legal requirement for a vote of no confidence to be takes against Nizar and the Ssultan could looks at other means to determine if he has lost the support of his fellow lawmakers.
In this case the Sultan was right to speak to the three independent and 28 BN lawmakers and it is was clear Nizar had lost the support of the majority in the House.
He added that the High Court judge had wrongly interpreted the Perak constitution.
Nizar and other Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders attended today a Court of Appeal hearing on Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir’s appeal against last week’s high court decision ruling Nizar the rightful MB.
The constitutional crisis has dragged on since BN’s power grab in February.
There is growing support for fresh polls, even among BN leaders, for fresh polls as a way to resolve the conflict.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has suggested BN were ready for talks with PR leaders to find a solution.
DAP Perak Chief Ngeh Koo Ham echoed Nizar and told The Malaysian Insider that the best way out of the political mess was to dissolve the state assembly.
“The court isn’t the place to solve the Perak crisis and whatever the outcome the crisis in Perak will drag on and whoever loses will appeal,” stressed Ngeh.
Ngeh went on to say that Pakatan Rakyat was more concerned with how to find a solution.
The Court of Appeal will give its decision tomorrow afternoon.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment