Get ready !!!!!! . Get ready !!!!!! Tell your freind Now!!!!!! Get ready soon . !!!!!! . . Tpk said... Dah ckp dari awal memang rentetan peristiwa sebelum persidangan 7 Mei tu dah langgar undg2 dan pelik sgt. Akhirnya jadi tragedi 7 Mei, skrg ni UBN dah pening...nak bubar DUN pening, tak bubar pening!! Kenapa? Aku pun tak larat nak cerita dah, byk laman blog dok bincang / bahas hal nie, salah satu kat The Scribe blog Dato' A Kadir Jasin. Aku tak larat nak taip balik,so aku copy & paste je. Berikut ialah arguement aku dlm blog dia, biasale AKJ ni anak Kedah org lama UMNO,org TDM, kita kena fahamle Tpk said... Petikan dari sumber a.k.jasin b/s The judgement - regarding the 3 ADUNs (melompat) can still be appealed. I’m not sure whether that has been done, but if not, their position is still arguable pending final decision. As for the 7 ADUNs, please make sure we really, clearly understand the fact that UMNO has applied for the wrong judgement / declaration and that was what they get from the courts. (it was just a token or “jaga hati” for the power that be). “A declaration merely declares what the legal rights of the concerned parties are. A declaratory order HAS NO COERCIVE FORCE as such NOR DOES IT QUASH any decision which may have been taken by an administrative authority”. The constitution clearly stated that any decision of the DUN, the Speaker (in his official capacity) and THE COMMITTEE and sub committee CANNOT BE CHALLENGED in the courts of law, the judges understand this. Remember, the 7 ADUNs has been suspended by The Committee (Jawatankuasa Hak dan Kebebasan). Was it a joke when the courts declared that The Speaker does not have the authority to suspend the 7 ADUNs?? Off course he knew that, but The Committee does possess that kind of authority!! Further more, it is just a declaration with NO COERCIVE FORCE, not a “certiorary & mandamus” declaration. So? the suspension is still valid!! When The Speaker ordered the 10 ADUNs out of the State Legislative Assembly (SLA), he was merely practising his rights as THE SPEAKER of the house, but they refused, since it would be disastrous for BN. If they leave the SLA, BN might not win the vote of no-confidence against DS Nizar with just 21 votes left. They knew this all along and that is why it's crucial to repalce The Speaker at all cost!! DS Nizar is clearly a legitimate MB…a rightful MB...so? what of Zambry? Definitely he is the illegitimate MB, thus his line of Excos is illegitimate plus his government is illegal too. How can an illegitimate government convened the 7th May assembly? Ok, lets say that the Sultan approved for the assembly that day, what authority does that Pangkor ADUN (Zambry) had to request for that assembly? Can’t we see that all the event becomes illegal? rendering everything in the 7th May assembly illegal including the appointment of Ganesan!! The illegitimate speaker also cannot convened for the next SLA sitting. UMNO BN knows this very well, resulting to their reluctance to convene the SLA in the near future, even when they thought that they have the upper hand to table the motion to ousted DS Nizar through the vote of no-confidence. Well, I think I don’t have to comment on whether who started the idea of “lompat melompat” because morally “lompat” is wrong but allowed by the constitution. PR never question that. The arguement is that the manner they “lompat”. These 3 ADUNs has been bought and have cases in courts. In future, can u accept IF the 31 MPs “lompat” to PR? Care to read the views of others at :option= http://www.harakahdaily.net/bm/index.php/arkib-liputan-khas/index.php?com_content&task=view&id=20407&Itemid=1 If you are really sincere to try to understand what is the difference between DS Anwar’s theory of 16th Sept and the unethical moved by PM Najib to grab the power in Perak, please read this : http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/21974/84